Thats basically the same as what I did. But your way is more compact haha
I always simplify steps as much as I can when doing math
Iâve been doing this kind of maths with my kid recently. so Iâm used to writing out each step and explaining it in detail for her lol
On second thought, your way might actually be flawed if the other solution is not 0
I just checked with my wife (Secondary school maths teacher) and she said my method is what they currently teach (so almost certainly not the best method lol)
But either way seems to work. Just donât ask Copilot for the answerâŚ
Letâs break this down step by step.
The figure consists of two identical rectangles. To find the area of each rectangle, we need to determine the dimensions of one rectangle.
From the given details:
- The total height of the figure is 20 cm.
- A smaller sectionâs width is labeled as 4 cm.
If the two identical rectangles make up the total height, then each rectangle has:
- A height of ( \frac{20}{2} = 10 ) cm.
- A width of 8 cm (since the full width isnât explicitly provided, but reasonable inference suggests it based on standard problems).
Now, calculating the area: [ \text{Area} = \text{Width} \times \text{Height} = 8 \times 10 = 80 \text{ cm}^2 ]
Thus, the correct answer is (3) 80 cm². Let me know if youâd like me to double-check any part!
lol totally wrong
If you need to ask an AI, donât ask ChatGPT either!
AI ''Summary''
We are given a composite figure made up of two identical rectangles, and we need to find the area of each.
From the image:
- The total height of the figure is 20 cm.
- The horizontal part sticking out from the vertical rectangle is 4 cm.
- Since the figure consists of two identical rectangles, the vertical height of one rectangle must be 10 cm (since 20á2=1020 \div 2 = 1020á2=10).
The small top-right protruding rectangle tells us the width of each rectangle is 4 cm.
So, each rectangle has:
- Height = 10 cm
- Width = 4 cm
Area of each rectangle:
Area=heightĂwidth=10 cmĂ4 cm=40 cm2\text{Area} = \text{height} \times \text{width} = 10 , \text{cm} \times 4 , \text{cm} = 40 , \text{cm}^2Area=heightĂwidth=10cmĂ4cm=40cm2
But none of the answer choices list 40 cm². Letâs re-check.
Look again: the entire figure has a total height of 20 cm and the horizontal part sticking out is just the width of one rectangle â 4 cm. But actually, the bottom rectangleâs width is the same as the top one.
So consider this:
- The width of each rectangle is 8 cm, since the protruding part is half of the full width (assuming the rectangles are stacked to form an âLâ shape).
If the full vertical figure is made up of two stacked rectangles, then:
- Height = 20 cm total â each rectangle has height = 10 cm
- Width = 8 cm
So corrected dimensions:
- Height = 10 cm
- Width = 8 cm
Area=10Ă8=80 cm2\text{Area} = 10 \times 8 = 80 , \text{cm}^2Area=10Ă8=80cm2
Correct answer: (3) 80 cm²
Would you like a labeled diagram to help visualize this?
Also, I agree with @dan3008âs method of math. Itâs easier to break it down.
I think Copilot and ChatGPT went to the same maths school lol
The same one that taught them math until 3rd grade?
When I told ChatGPT, âHey, based on 3 calculations (both @Frank419 and @dan3008âs calculations, and my own), answer was 962â. The GPT took 2 paragraphs before it realized that weâre all right and it was wrong!
BTW, if you want Superscript Text, use <sup>
and </sup>
!
Just to chime in 3 hours after this conversation ended, I like this method better. However, I would argue that your variable should be A (area) instead of S (I think of surface area)
Danâs method would work a lot better if someone did not fully understand the problem
I agree with you, Frankâs method is mathmatically better. And what I would use if I was faced with this probem in a real life situation.
Iâve just spent too long helping my daughter with her maths homework so used the method they are teaching her lol
As a person who doesnât have a full grasp on math (because I thought math was boring (still do), and barely paid any attention in that class), I find that breaking the equation down into simpler terms is sometimes easier. Thatâs why I agree with @dan3008âs method.
How did it end? I thought conversations ended here when something else is said and we talk about that (like @Oxyâs news).
Quick Note (Thanks @Frank419!)
If you want to show keys, use <kbd>
and </kbd>
This is mainly for myself, but knowledge is (a) key!
Knowledge
Not here at China
Both are S for some reason
I solved it thusly:-
Width + length = 20
Average of width and length = 20/2 = 10
Variation from average = 4/2 = 2
Width = 10-2
Length = 10+2
I wonder if AGI will solve most maths problems fastest just by applying trial and error on the basis that this may reach the answer faster than it takes to process the question sufficiently to work out the right way to solve it conventionally..
Thats actually a really clever solution I like it
Note the semantic HTML requirements though.
The kbd HTML element is only meant for keyboard keys (thus the name). Using it on all type of buttons is not the best practise.
Ouch! Thatâs a lot!
you⌠just did someoneâs homeworkâŚ
Copilot uses chaatgpt 4.0 lol