20000 forum users - Awesome Special Event!

No, WHMCS sucks and I will never host it myself. I was not talking about the WHMCS interface, but rather the relationship it was with cPanel.

Or do something that does not require iFN to get the chance to mess something up:

When a user creates an account, delete the domain immediately, then add it back in again. Then, login via FTP and remove the “htdocs” folder completely.

Only downside is FTP access is not enabled until after vP is loaded, but maybe people will see a folder with their domain name and click that instead of the htdocs folder.

5 Likes

Someone should ask iFN to CHMOD that so users can’t edit it

6 Likes

pop goes the diesel :rofl:

3 Likes

Sure, still alive and kicking.
Are yours giving you issue?

4 Likes

I don’t think that’s technically possible. The home directory is still owned by the account, so all files in it are always visible. The only alternative would be to not have the .htaccess in the home directory.

Interesting idea though. And it might be easier to implement than expected, because all account’s home directories are grouped per reseller domain already anyway.

That’s already the case. And all it does is return a nasty error when people try to save the file and then they come here to complain.

5 Likes

No one answered my emails, they didn’t extend mine and I lost them

3 Likes

Well, at least I got this reply

image

3 Likes

A lot of us use it, so maybe someone will find it interesting (I have premium, but it’s probably the same on the free version)

3 Likes

Can I hear your thoughts as to why you use another service over Windows Defender?

(Unless this subscription is for a Linux, then ignore me)

5 Likes

Because it offers much more in terms of protection (not only AV and the most basic FW like Defender)



but mostly because I have the option to block certain programs from going online

Activation keys for premium can be found online cheaply
I paid €4 for mine, it lasts 12 months from the time you enter it
a man from Poland says they fell out of a truck (I don’t care if it’s true or not) :joy:

4 Likes

Windows Firewall?

THB is don’t really see anything in those screenshots that Defender or another Windows Core app can do for free.

3 Likes

Most of it is also in the free version, so you don’t pay anything.

AV is much better and the rest… you have a lot of comparisons online

Install it and try it out for 24 hours and see what is easier for you to use :joy:

FW logs are easy to read, quickly turn off and turn on any rule for a specific app, ports, etc.

4 Likes

The firewall log looks someone useful, I’ll give you that.

But I also never really feel the need to know what a programs doing, if I feel to suspicious of it, into a VM or off the computer entirely it goes.


Unrelated, this is funny:

4 Likes

I’ve shortened it all so that it doesn’t appear to be avast advertising :slightly_smiling_face:
Simply try Avast free for at least 24 hours… until you get used to the menu and other things…

Of course, for some normal use, you don’t need anything advanced
but if you repair other people’s laptops, or mobile phones, you insert USB sticks from yours into theirs, and vice versa, you execute various codes, you have a web server stack package, an IDE, someone uses torrents, cracks, a bunch of things where it is simply necessary to have insight into what is happening in the background…

In fact free programs are the worst
because they spy on you the most, so even at the first start you can see that it tries to send a bunch of data to their server about your hardware, etc…username and so on…That is one of the easiest ways to break into someone’s computer or gain access to other things such as email etc.

You create a program that seems to be useful
and everyone uses it for years because it’s free, when you get tired of developing it further then it often happens that it is sold on the black market and someone or some XY country and its secret service gets access to millions of devices.

The advantage of “smart FW” is that here you can set “ask mode”
and then when some program wants to go online or send something out
a window pops up and asks you “do you want to allow or not, this and that, to this and that IP” etc…
You also have the option “remember”.
Just by that behavior, you know how much to trust a program…

Let’s say in some program you disabled “auto update” in its options
and it still opens connections to some XY servers every minute
it’s not quite normal.

But, to begin with, you don’t have to use “ask me” mode but default, so Avast will decide for itself


As far as AV is concerned, it is not only important to recognize a virus
but to remove it in a smart way without damaging the OS
and this is also the difference between AV engines
and of course by speed, sys. resource consumption, etc.

4 Likes

I used to use Avast, but I still haven’t gotten myself to trust them again after they were caught selling user’s information. I’ve actually just been using Defender because I can’t find a clear answer on what antivirus doesn’t do that, while still actually working nowadays (I’m aware Defender has the same privacy issue, but Windows itself collects the same kind of telemetry). Free or premium.

3 Likes

I’ve got an 11 year old laptop for that :slight_smile:
If it get’s a virus then it will be cleared, not really anything on it but unused programs.

Which is where VMs and Windows Sandbox with policy editor comes into play

I just don’t understand how a 3rd party AV can do a better job then Defender, Defender has access to so much more parts of the computer then anyone else does, and I don’t want to grant an AV access to run in the background, so auto-checks, etc, because how do I know that I can trust them:

4 Likes

Some sources on the matter:

I remember when it first came to light. A lot of different experts vowed not to recommend Avast again… though some still do or have started doing so again. Even if they no longer harvest information on their users, it’s risky to just assume they won’t do so again (especially since it’s important to keep AVs up to date).

2 Likes

I’m still using Microsoft Defender on my main PC, though the best antivirus is always your mind, but it’s always safer to even use the antivirus that’s on every new Windows installation instead of a third-party one.

If you insist in using a third-party antivirus, though, maybe it’s better to use a lightweight one…

2 Likes

Interesting that you used avast and liked it. Meanwhile I don’t like it because one, on my dad’s laptop which has windows 7 installed on a hard disk, avast contributed ~30% to laptop’s boot time. Two, avast ui used chromium underneath so the ux is a little bad imo. Three, as Edward said, avast is probably the shadiest antivirus out there. Four, by using windows’ built in defender (on 10 and 11), ad blocking browser extension, and common sense to double check links before clicking it is already enough for basic protection
Also I lose my regular badge, nice :slight_smile:

4 Likes

:rofl: Someone is pissed up

4 Likes